Home > categories > Consumer Electronics > Power Banks > Cons claim Jackson was following the Constitution when ending the National Bank (in fact what led to the FED?
Question:

Cons claim Jackson was following the Constitution when ending the National Bank (in fact what led to the FED?

), when in fact, when the Supreme Court told him it was unconstitutional to remove Indians from their lands (for his rich friends), he said The Supreme Court has made their decision - let them enforce it with their Army and sent them on their death marches anyway.Is that supporting the Constitution?

Answer:

In which prison were the convicts claiming this?
The two issues have nothing to do with each other.
Where did you learn your version of history? The Fed was created 100 years later and expansionism was the reason fro the removal of the Eastern Tribes. Ever hear of Manifest Destiny?

Share to: