Home > categories > Minerals & Metallurgy > Aluminum Foils > Does recycling exhaust more resources than it saves?
Question:

Does recycling exhaust more resources than it saves?

With the exception of aluminum I heard recycling things like paper and plastic cost more money and exhaust more resources than from making these things from scrapI also heard that there is vast huge amounts of land fill space to spare, and we are no where near filling these land fills to capacity.What do you know of this?

Answer:

Actually, ancient civilizations were smarter than we areIt has been scientifically proven that our brain copassity is decreasingThe only problem is that because of the evolution lie, people think are ancestors were dumb apesthanks :) Mark- BTW it was a typo! Stop being mean because you didnt get taken by your magical fairy aliens
Why do people who believe in aliens underestimate human ingenuity and effort so badly?
curiously there are additionally structures up there that could basically be interpreted as docks, wharfs, shipyardsit is mindless in any respect twenty thousand feet up a mountain, whether the locals have been completely out of their collective tree on cocaine and oxygen deprivationin case you settle for the quays and wharfs as quickly as have been used to moor ships, the sole achievable rationalization is that the stones weren't lugged up twenty thousand feet of Andes in spite of everythingsome courageous yet logical thinkers have stated all this grow to be initially accomplished at sea point in a in a various way shaped south united statesathen some style of cataclysm or organic disaster occurred that reshaped the continent and created mountains the place there have been none earlierbecause it is demanding to wreck structures produced from 50 ton granite bricks, those have been carried up with the newly rising mountains - even nevertheless the disaster killed off the civilisation who created the citiesi'm no longer declaring it particularly is genuine, in spite of the shown fact that it is an thrilling answer that good and easily suits the widely used data, whether the artefacts may be plenty older than 500 BC (it is marvelous how resistant archeology is to the thought there have been different civilisations earlier ours).
omg people couldnt have dragged rocks a long time ago must have been aliens its hard to believe because you have zero evidence for your ancient astronaut hypothesis, and why any space faring species would come all the way here just to construct simple geometric shapes with common rocks and basic mathematics
Roadhazz was a bit incorrectGoogle please, before you provide answersPlastics are not infinitely recyclableHeating causes the petroleum to break downSo, depending on what plastic you start with, you have two or three times to become a new plasticThe lowest of the lows are plastic bags and lawn furnitureNot recyclable at all - (despite what that recycle box tells you at the grocery store -plastic bags are landfilled) This is why you hear of carpets and clothes these days being made of plastic bottlesThey were on their last lifeSecond, recycling is a costly businessThat is why only the most profitable materials pay (aluminum, copper, brass)The money you get for plastics is a refund of the cost you were charged (CRV in California) in addition to the cost of the actual itemIt is an incentive to recycleThey give you your own money back Now, the question of whether you use more resources to recycle than to use virgin materials depends on how you look at itWe are saving virgin sources by collecting used products but we are using more energy (a resource) to recycle than to make a virgin productIt evens out, which will only become very apparent if we run out of any one resourceFor example, if diamonds become extinct, Brides will all wish we had reclaimed some of the millions of diamonds in pawn shops so that the virgin supply would have lasted longerYou can extrapolate this scenario to aluminum or petroleum or (my fav) treesAdded: Paper and plastic recycle two to three times eachThey are equal in recyclabilityI don't understand where Roadhazz's comparison comes inAgain, google, google, google.

Share to: