The 7.5kW motor pumps the generator and directly uses the diesel engine, which is economical
I think it's cost-effective to drive directly from diesel engines. The reason is that any mechanical transformation has an efficiency problem. The efficiency of converting a diesel engine into a generator is 80%, and the generator to the compressor is 80%. Then the conversion efficiency from the diesel engine to the generator to the compressor is only 56%. The direct conversion efficiency from the diesel engine to the compressor can reach 80%.
By your means, can it be understood that the diesel engine is directly used to drive the air pump, or is it a cost-effective diesel fuel generator?1. use a diesel engine if your pump is ready to flow.2. in a fixed location, please find the power directly, use the motor. (motor efficiency is higher than diesel, and noise and cleanliness are very good, it seems that junior high school physics has been mentioned gasoline; diesel; motor three efficiency)3, if the Sinopec is your home open words (^_^) can then use the motor drive pump of diesel generator
The direct drive of a diesel engine with an air pump is certainly the most economical and simple. The main reasons are as follows:1, from the cost of equipment, eliminating the generators and motors, greatly reducing the cost of equipment.2, from the energy conversion and efficiency comparison, from the diesel engine - Generator - motor - pump in the middle of the energy consumption is relatively much greater.3, from the maintenance cost and use of operation considerations, diesel engine direct drive more economical.
