What's the difference between formatting U disks FAT and FAT32? Generally speaking, I use 32, but when I use 32 format, I lose something. It's better to use FAT.
The FAT32 format is fairly compact
Of course, you can use DTFS format better ~ depending on the performance of the hardware to decide ~ you think that kind of not wrong, choose which kind
FAT:FAT is FAT16, DOS and Windows 95 used in the past are using the FAT16 file system, and now commonly used Windows, 98/2000/XP and other systems support the FAT16 file system. It can manage large to 2GB partitions, but each partition can have at most 65525 clusters (the cluster is the configuration unit of disk space). As the size of the hard disk or partition increases, each cluster takes up more and more space, which leads to waste of hard disk space.FAT32: with the emergence of large capacity drives, FAT32 has become popular since Windows 98. It is an enhanced version of FAT16 that supports large to 2TB (2048GB) partitions. FAT32 uses fewer clusters than FAT16, thus saving hard disk space effectively. FAT32 is a derivative of the FAT16 file system that supports smaller clusters and larger partitions than FAT16, which makes spatial allocation of FAT32 partitions more efficient. FAT32 is mainly used in Windows 98 and subsequent Windows (the actual system has never been officially released Windows 97, OSR2 began to support), it can enhance the disk performance and increase available disk space, but also to support long file names.
