Suddenly think of a problem, do not know right, the bulldozer is eight nuclear module four, and Intel's i5 i7 is every nuclear double thread, that is to say, for some only support dual core software, AMD is the only dual core, but with Intel's dual core four threads (equivalent to the quad core and so on) some optimization for multi core CPU software, Intel I series bulldozers strong
The problem with bulldozers is that they do all kinds of optimizations, and now the systems and software do not support, just like when the dual kernel came out, there was no effective support for dual core systems and software, and the heroes were useless. In addition, the fact that AMD single nuclei are weak is a fact of the past few years. On a cartoon point of view, a bulldozer can't work on a job site, but a bulldozer can win a car at high speed Roller is the same, do not have too much hope. If not bad money and have a fever of high-frequency I7, if the game player, game player is common, and also consider the economic problems on the Athlon is enough. I am now 890GX plus 640 and 6770, basically sweeping a game, such as mission call, battlefield 3, speed 16, full height, no problem at all, bottleneck on hard disk. If StarCraft is the 2. big city of the red alert 3. core optimization is not good, only iU strengths, bulldozer roller are not. Like speed 17, except U
With the ability to speak, light boast yourself meaningless, playing games, how to say is amd world, we all say so!
Not that you say, AMD's CPU design capability is much worse than Intel, resulting in poor performance, whether it's dual core or 4 core, single kernel is poor.
