I live in a remote location and my power bill is just ridiculously expensive -- I did the math and it seems like it'll be way cheaper for me to use my solar panel (which currently supplies DC power to a few parts of the house) and a diesel/oil/propane generator (which I have yet to purchase), and just cut off all mains power.Question is, which of these configurations is better?1)-Solar panel-DC generator-Large battery bank-High-wattage inverterResult: AC power throughout the house, using both solar panel and generator to charge the batteries as needed2)-Solar panel-AC generator-Smaller battery bank (for solar panel only)-No inverterResult: AC power when generator running, DC power from solar panel and batteries (I use DC right now for lights and a few basic appliances so I can live without AC power)Or should I do a combination of both, like using an inverter for the solar panel to always provide AC power?Thanks.
i)Increase the no. of solar panels, as it is a one time expenditure only. A battery bank(of sufficient size) A small DC generator ii) If you live in an area where oil is really cheap try investing in an AC generator The first option will always be better
u ought to apply it with out batteries yet u'll choose batteries if u prefer to save electricity for whilst there's no sunlight or in case of a potential failure. grid linked PV platforms would possibly no longer particularly require batteries, so as that way it is going to become greater low-fee. so yeah i assume u ought to do away with batteries. if u do choose a battery(for potential cuts or nighttime time) i assume u ought to get one in each of those united statesbatteries (120V in line with threat) ,the greater moderen batteries dont certainly choose that plenty maintenance. with admire to a wind generator, i'm no longer particularly specific, so i'm unlikely to purpose and answer that one.
