Which is the best of the two? I heard that the AMD4 core is inferior to the Intel 2 kernel I rely on, I would like to ask, amd6 nuclear or 8 nuclear power Intel 4 Nuclear? I mainly play games, through the FireWire FPS, I want more than 200, video card recommend one.I know AMD is cheap, but it's a dime a share. Where is Intel's money? 4 Nuclear stem but 2 nuclear, what's the matter?
FPS ready for more than 200? What kind of monitor are you going to match?The core is divided into applications, AMD's kernel performance is not as good as Intel, but in multi-threaded applications, multi-core useful, multi-threaded applications that 4 core than 2 core, a little ripped.
The main reason is Intel your support and optimization of some large-scale professional software, such as 3D design software, and some do not even support AMD CPu, in addition, the single core processing ability of Intel CPU is relatively strong. But for the general web and game based users, AMD is cost-effective, first of all. In particular, some console users who play games.
The core is uselessMost games support dual core at mostSo the single core performance strong Intel U AMD is awesomeFor example, i5 3470 has only 4 cores, and FX8150 has 8 nucleiBut when you play a game, you use 2 cores at most, and i5 is much fasterUnless you are leveling, hang up dozens of window function can reflect the multi coreYou play CF DNF this game, low-end configuration can be done.If the budget is enough to play a long time, the other large single word play,With i5+8G memory, +7850 or 660 levels of graphics cards, the host 3500 yuan.
