Home > categories > Minerals & Metallurgy > Magnetic Materials > Electrostatics VS Magnetism: Whos got AC/DC?
Question:

Electrostatics VS Magnetism: Whos got AC/DC?

Rub your feet across the carpet in the winter you will create an electrostatic charge. Do we consider this DC or AC or.?If electrostatics magnetism are different, then,When they first made compasses, they would rub needles. To me, this is electrostatics. Anyways, they would then float them in water they would of course interact with earth‘s magnetic field spin accordingly. So now it‘s okay to say there‘s a relationship between electrostatics magnetism?orPerhaps the needles were rubbed with natural magnets like lodestone .so you can‘t really call it electrostatics?Thanks.Will rate.

Answer:

minor damage can be fixed major damage CAN'T be fixed unless the car was a museum piece.its probably not worth getting such a small thing fixed (sorry)
i would get seat covers. there are many styles and can give the interior of your car a face lift
Static electricity is DC as there are positive and negative charges which do not alternate. Compass needles were originally magnetised by rubbing with natural magnets, i.e. lodestones.
Electrostatic charge is DC. there is no difference between the charge from static, and the voltage from a battery, they are both DC. Battery voltage is low, static charge is high, thousands of volts. they would rub needles. To me, this is electrostatics. No, rubbing a magnetic material with a magnet is a way of inducing magnetic charge in it. It is not the same a rubbing wool, for example, which induces a static charge. However, magnetism and static electricity are linked. DC current, for example, causes a magnetic field around the wire. And magnetism, at it's root, is due to an arrangement of charges. This gets into complicated math. pedia: Ordinarily, the enormous number of electrons in a material are arranged such that their magnetic moments (both orbital and intrinsic) cancel out. This is due, to some extent, to electrons combining into pairs with opposite intrinsic magnetic moments as a result of the Pauli exclusion principle (see electron configuration), or combining into filled subshells with zero net orbital motion. In both cases, the electron arrangement is so as to exactly cancel the magnetic moments from each electron. Moreover, even when the electron configuration is such that there are unpaired electrons and/or non-filled subshells, it is often the case that the various electrons in the solid will contribute magnetic moments that point in different, random directions, so that the material will not be magnetic. However, sometimes — either spontaneously, or owing to an applied external magnetic field — each of the electron magnetic moments will be, on average, lined up. Then the material can produce a net total magnetic field, which can potentially be quite strong. The magnetic behavior of a material depends on its structure, particularly its electron configuration, for the reasons mentioned above, and also on the temperature. At high temperatures, random thermal motion makes it more difficult for the electrons to maintain alignment.

Share to: