They are ALWAYS in a Tizzy...suppose this Court becomes less Reactionary? if 2 Justices Retire then the Court is More Likely to re-consider Legislation...a con crusher court?
The People are sending Barry back to Kenya to live with his brother in the mud hut in November !
one of obamas current appointed justices urged egypt not to model its constitution after that of the US...if you view this as ok, you deserve the consequences of what will happen after another 4 years of obama. if i have ten dollars and i want something that's twenty dollars i can't afford it, this is a foreign concept to a lot of people now adays.
republicans are afraid of their own shadows. it's a birth defect.
More importantly than being a Con crusher, it would be a Constitution crusher. Liberal Progressive judges are more interested in reinterpreting the Constitution based on current well-intentioned Progressive social attitude (i.e. legislating from the bench) than applying Originalism as the Founders expected, leaving reinterpretation to the amending process and the people of the US rather than judges. Sotomayor was picked as to inject empathy into the court system, that's NOT Originalism. Kagan has never been a justice nor had much legal experience, except as a legal hack for the Obama Administration prior to her nomination to SCOTUS. Ginsburg recently said that the US Constitution should not be used as a basis for a country's new Constitution due to it's lack of support for Human Rights. Too bad no one ever told her, that was INTENTIONAL. The US Constitution is based on Natural (Individual) Rights, not Human (Collective) Rights, which is a free ticket for government to define, create, manage, regulate and even take away rights for the people. This is a vehicle for control.
