and rained fire in his magic flight suit?
An extreme example is y 0 x^2 + 6 where your parabola is just a completely flat line, so it is the most wide when the coefficient of x^2 is zero. If you have y ax^2 and a1 then the graph will lie above yx^2 and the bigger x^2 is, the greater the distance between ax^2 and x^2 will be. You should notice y is a number that is shown as a vertical distance on a graph. To understand it better for yourself, you might want to draw these three parabolas on a piece of graph paper y 1/2 x^2: (0, 0) (1, 1/2) (2, 2) (3, 4.5) .. y x^2 (0, 0) (1, 1) (2, 4) (3, 9) . y 2 x^2 (0, 0) (1, 2) (2, 8) (3,18) .. The bigger the multiplier, the more the shape is stretched vertically. You can imagine it like on a rubber sheet and if the multiplier is larger then the sheet is stretched higher up towards the top of the graph. If the multiplier is less than zero it's basically the same thing but then it goes in the downward direction instead. If the multiplier is between 0 and 1 like 1/2 then the shape is kind of squashed down instead, in a smooth linear way, as you might see from a perspective view, or from a shadow if the sun is high in the sky.
Yes, you can fire a bullet in space. The bullet will travel at a velocity even greater than that within the earths atmosphere since pressure is zero (i.e. air mass does not have to be moved out of the gun barrel by the advancing bullet). As well, the bullet will travel at this velocity for a very very long distance and period of time until is hits something solid or until it hits enough atomic particles (Yes there are particles in space just not very many) to eventually slow it down and stop it. I have no idea how far that would be, but I would guess that it would travel an incredible distance for a many eons. As for oxygen required for the detonation (i.e. nothing burns without oxygen) well, gunpowder carries its own. That's why a gun can also be fired underwater (as long as the bullets are waterproof and the powder stays dry), but this may result in damage to the gun due to the mass of water which must be pushed out the barrel thus increasing the mass which must be accelerated out of the barrel. I think this would also cause the gun to have quite a kickback underwater.
If there's a bath close to the detector the steam will spark off an ionization form smoke detector. if that is the case try a photoelectric smoke detector at this area. they're a lot less tender because they require more advantageous particulates to set them off. i might want to relocate your modern detector in route of your furnace and dryer. A smoke detector isn't a carbon monoxide detector! i might want to also recommend buying this way of for the justifications listed in this communicate board. sturdy success!
