Home > categories > Chemical > Additives > Is there much scientific evidence that proves that many food additives and preservatives are actually harmful?
Question:

Is there much scientific evidence that proves that many food additives and preservatives are actually harmful?

like the health food stores and aficionados preach ?

Answer:

if you have a clogged filter and the fluid is low or really dirty it could cause alot of problems.you could change the filter flush the transmission and add more fluid.that is the cheaper route to try first. and check your shifter.it could cause confusion if it is loose. if that doesnt work you need to replace or rebuild the transmission.
sounds like it may be the vacuum modulator. check out the modulator and also make sure it is getting vacuum and is functioning properly if it doesn't have a vacuum modulator then it has to have some other means of knowing the engine rpms, so in that case maybe a TP cable issue. you should also service it to. (i.e. filter and oil change.)
There are literally millions of reports suggesting that these preservatives are not for consumption by humans. Yes, this does include the preservatives listed by others. You want to know why US is allowing this to happen?! Cause they don't give a damn about you and everybody else. It's cheap, efficient, and made for mass production. Your life is the lowest priority for the big corporate businesses and their connections to the government has allowed them to do what the hell they want unless millions of people die, then they think about what they should do.
Not really, the main this is they claim pesticides cause long term damage to people. However there arnt any actual long term studys on people that actually prove this. There doesnt seem to be much evidence on it really i do notice the big thing people say is. Its natural that means its good for you! There are plenty of people whom live long healthy lives without touching overtly expensive organic foods. However im sure youll hear alot more people claiming its better for you, i may be unaware also of some studys. I think if the food was a serious danger to people the government would restrict it.
First- Lioness gave a great answer, with scientific evidence. I had to add that I think you may be missing the main point. You question whether cooking the meat and killing any potentially harmful bacteria is more beneficial than feeding the meat raw, but at the same time completely fail to realize that it doesn't matter if there are bacteria in the meat. Dogs do not have the digestive system of a human, they digest their food at LEAST four times faster than we do. The bacteria doesn't sit in their guts long enough to do the damage it would do to us. I, honestly believe, you need to try to stop comparing your dog to you and see it for what it really is. As others have said (curtis I believe) balancing a cooked diet the way you are doing is very difficult because of the stripping of nutrients. All diets sold for dogs in stores contain a vitamin/mineral mix to make up for the cooking process.

Share to: