the 8 core bulldozer is shares stuff between cores. So all I want to know is if this is a CPU that dose NOT share components.
Very poorly.... AMD processors are in basic terms low priced substitutes for Intel, for people who don't understand or do not care approximately overall performance. additionally AMD helps their processors to run at ninety to ninety 5% potential, with a view to be waiting to sell quicker clock speeds (GHZ). That bills for larger temperatures and the processor being greater uncovered to failure. Intel protects their processors via proscribing the clock velocity (GHz) nicely bellow what the processor can quite handle (seventy 5 to eighty% tops). This leads to diminish temperatures and greater stable overall performance for Intel. in fact, that AMD is in basic terms a twin center processor with 4 processing threads, yet on the grounds that AMD has literary redefined the definition of a processor center, they promote it as a quad center. additionally, in basic terms thoroughly uneducated human beings could choose a processor via its clock velocity (GHz). The quad center Intel i5 is lots greater effective.
Same thing. Get the Phenom II X6 if you want to get AMD. They all use the "modules". To be honest, you should be looking into Intel. AMD is going to look more into graphics and less into their CPU's. Intel's processors current are leading. Even the entry level i3's can beat the highest end FX-8150 in games and many applications. The optimizations in Windows 8 and all that stuff is very minor. If you're looking for a processor in that price range, consider the i5 2300 or i3 2120 or something like that. It will perform better than the "6" core AMD and even the old Phenom II's can beat Bulldozer.
