proof of additive inverse, -(-a)a. By using a+(-a)0?
Well.because modern torque converters (automatic) are superior to manuals in hp efficiency. .it could be caused by under drive gear ratio differencesor even overdrive gear ratio differences.unless the automatic can engage a converter lock up clutch on the get go.the manual has the advantage on the starting lineI guess it would depend on when the manual overcame the automatic in the race.
Identical cars , same HP,same rear end,same tires w/ different trans in each? The automatic will shift at optimum RPM. Newer torque converters still lock into gear but shift more smoothly at the proper time. Pro dragsters are using modified autos to eliminate wheelspin sloppy shifts. If the cars are different models ,set up differently different weight,different power curve.,etc it could go either way even if the HP is the same
By the additive identity, -(-a) 0 + -(-a) By substitution, -(-a) [ a + (-a)] + -(-a) Apply the associative property to get, -(-a) a + [(-a) + -(-a)] But by the given theorem, -(-a) a + [0] So finally, by the additive identity, -(-a) a
the manual trans shifts on your command so you can redline it the auto trans has a computer to tell it when to shift so in other words the manual you can shift at 7000 rpms which will give u a jump when you shift to your next gear but the auto will probably shift at 3-4000 rpms. manual is wayyyy beter than auto in raceing