SLR camera lens anti-shake and not anti-shake great difference? Anti-shake and anti-shake lens that is more practical?
In addition, some card machine there are "natural anti-shake" "electronic anti-shake" and other pseudo-shake, this is to improve the IOS sensitivity, sacrifice quality to achieve a safe shutter, no meaning
Lens image stabilization is to rely on the lens anti-shake components of the displacement to achieve anti-shake, you can visually see the viewfinder anti-shake effect. Relative, because each lens need to have their own anti-shake components, the lens price is relatively high, usually than the same specifications without anti-shake of your 1000.
According to the safety shutter, the proposed 18-55 standard zoom lens, you can not use anti-shake lens. 70-200 like telephoto lens, anti-shake is more necessary.
This is only because of people, iron hand work well, safe shutter can be relatively low.
The general anti-shake can make less than the safety shutter 3-4 file photos are not "paste"
In addition, anti-shake body anti-shake and lens anti-shake two
Body anti-shake is the displacement of the sensor to correct jitter, the anti-shake effect is only reflected in the photo, from the viewfinder can not see the effect. With the body of anti-shake machine using any lens has anti-shake function, to achieve the cost of anti-shake is relatively low.
Take a safe shutter, roughly the use of the lens focal length of the countdown, such as 18-135 lens, the use of 18-side is, the safety shutter for the 1/18 seconds, 135 side was 1/135 seconds.
The shutter is below the reciprocal of the focal length, there may be people heart beating, breathing and hand shake to the photo, the photo will "paste".
