They absorb solar heat and transform it into electricity, so there should be less heat left to warm the planet. Shouldn't we at least plaster all the world's deserts with them?
The opposite - they heat the Earth up. The ground underneath might be brown or green or sand. The solar panels are Black. They absorb more radiant energy. Solar electricity is energy and somewhere down the wire will produce heat. Solar's saving grace is that it has the same heating effect year after year. But greenhouse gasses have a cumulative effect. The excess gasses produced in year one are added to the gasses in year two, etc. For instance say the heating of soalr cells is 5 times (5s) that of greenhouse gasses (g). Year - Total Heating - 5s + g 2 - 5s + 2g 3 - 5s + 3g 4 - 5s + 4g 5 - 5s + 5g 6 - 5s + 6g 7 - 5s + 7g 8 - 5s + 8g 9 - 5s + 9g 0 - 5s + 0g etc... In 50 years you have 50 - 5s + 50g
No, the top argument is that extra CO2 is inflicting the ambience to keep greater warmth from the sunlight. Having image voltaic panels might scale returned the quantity of CO2 interior the ambience we are putting in it real now via giving us an means source that doesn't emit CO2, and that's approximately it.
