Home > categories > Security & Protection > Safety Goggles > Car battery/ car alarm.?
Question:

Car battery/ car alarm.?

I know this question is going to sounds really stupid to all the guys who know stuff about cars. But I am going to ask it anyways because I don't know a thing, and my husband is currently deployed therefore he can't do it for me lol.I have a 2004 Saab 9-3 arc and my car battery died today because my car alarm wouldn't shut up for some unknown reason, so my daddy told me to take the entire battery out. So I did and it hasn't made a noise since. BUT my question is will the car alarm STILL go off even without a battery in it? Someone help me?I don't want to hear any sexist comments either. I don't know anything about cars, and I'm sure as sh*t you males don't know nothing about girl stuff. So don't make fun of me lol.

Answer:

With gas welding you don't have to worry about UV rays which in arc welding, will destroy your eyes (it will quickly give your eyes a deep sunburn) With gas welding you only need to worry about light intensity and the shade is a matter of choice. Some guys only use a little shade because they want to be able to see their work even when the torch isn't present. I use a darker shade but you tend to have to raise your shield a lot to see your work and positions. Some metals also make more light especially if you are cutting them with an oxygen stream.So either use the darker lens or get an automatic lens which darkens in response to light intensity. They cost more but are easy to use
It seems that the person was charged with the wrong offense. He/she should have been charged with possession of a drug related object, O.C.G.A. § 16-13-32.2. That offense requires strict proof of the intent to use the object for a drug related purpose, whereas possession of a controlled substance is a strict liability crime: you possess it, you are guilty. Georgia does not recognize the ancient defense of de minimis non curat lex, which is Latin for the law does not remedy a thing of the smallest consequence. In most states, committing a crime that has trivial impact will not be punishable, such as stealing a common stick from someone, threatening to beat them with a wet noodle, driving at .01 mph over the speed limit etc. Georgia has no such provision as far as I can tell, so possession of even the slightest amount such that the chemical test destroys all evidence in the process could still be an offense. The person should still consult an attorney. Perhaps the officer lacked reasonable suspicion to pat down the person or conducted a search outside of the scope of a search for weapons. Perhaps the prosecution will be unable to prove that the roadblock was properly authorized. Finally, perhaps the prosecution will fail to call the drug chemist as a witness under the new requirement from the recent Supreme Court decision in Massachusetts v. Melendez-Diaz (2009). - Scott v. State, 170 Ga. App. 409 (Georgia 1984) There is no minimum amount of a controlled substance in Georgia to constitute possession. Jones v. State 237 Ga. App. 847 (Georgia 1999) In this case, the officer testified that he knew immediately that the hollow glass tube in Jones' pocket was a pipe for smoking crack cocaine, and Jones admitted that the tube was a crack pipe. Possession of a crack pipe is possession of a drug related object in contravention of OCGA 16-13-32.2. guess that puts Halsca's legal theory out the window

Share to: