WHO WOULD WIN BATMAN OR IRON MAN
Iron Man would win this wouldn't be much of a fight ether. bats has some cool gadgets but batarangs wouldn't touch iron man and if they did i doubt they'd do anything. also batman maybe smart but tony stark is a genius. so Tony Stark (Iron Man) beats batman in smarts/speed/guns win for the IRON MAN!
I think that this question is ridiculous easy.I mean what could Batman do to an flying superhero,throw a Batarang?Even if Batman could challenge Iron Man to a face to face combat on the ground his Martial Arts could not even scratch Iron Man suit.Batman's weapons and gadgets are toys in front of Iron Man's Missiles and Laser weapons.Sorry Bats.If this fight could really happen (Batman RIP).But of course this could never happen.There is no reason for the good guys to fight each other.They are both freedom fighters!
Why does this question keep coming up? Batman doesn't stand a chance. He doesn't have the ability to do any damage to Iron Man. It doesn't matter how many martial arts he knows, he's still just a regular guy throwing punches at a metal plated suit of armor. He'll only break his own bones. Aside from having a suit with tons of weapons, and armor, Iron man is superhumanly fast, can heal from wounds, and can mentally connect with the worlds computer systems. He can telepathically control and aim Weapons satelites. Tony stark is smarter than Batman and he is an enhanced human. He wouldn't even need his suit to win. It just makes things easier. Batman couldn't create something to short circuit the Iron man armor either. It's only been hacked a few times in the history of Iron man and everytime it was done by an inside man who helped Stark create the armor, or was given access to his personal computers. So Bats could throw a few batorangs, punch the armor a couple of times, then take 1 repulsor blast to the chest and go down.
