What's the difference between bridging two segments of the same subnet and say using OpenVPN to bridge two physical separate segments? Is the OpenVPN bridging works the same?
shisha is a form of tobacco made for a water pipe aka hookah so get your facts strightalso it is on the wrong subject but ill still help lolmake your holes smaller in your apple this way it wont keep falling throughhookah smoking is perfectly legal look it up it's not for potthat would be a bong.
It all depends on how you configure your setupSite-to-Site VPN is virtually indistinguishable from a LAN to end users and requires no special software on each machine to set upIf you configure your gateways properly, it's even possible to have DNS name resolution working sitewideSome setups, however, might require the use of a WINS server for certain resolutionsIf you use a site-to-site routed VPN setup (as opposed to bridged), you will have two separate subnetsAnd while you will be able to connect to computers on each network, network neighborhood browsing typically does not work (though you can still directly access shares)Also, you won't be getting network broadcasts from one subnet to the otherThis is intentional and how it's designed to workConsequently, anything that relies on broadcast to work or find services (such as game servers) will not cross the subnetsIn a bridged site-to-site VPN, both are on the same subnet, therefore broadcasts cross the tunnelIf you're not careful how you set it up, you could end up with the DHCP server from the remote location giving out addresses to local clientsAs such, the gateway will be set to the remote routerMaking all traffic bound for the internet cross the vpn tunnel before going out, resulting in inefficiencies and possibly bogging down the VPN.
