In the fire code, what is the definition of trees that hinder fire engine operation? "Should not be planted between fire lane and building, set up trees that hinder fire truck operation?"
And now this provision is a normal person can be understood as you can set the trees, as long as not to interfere with the operation of fire truck can do, but this is how the definition of trees, speculation does not come out, can only ask the experts. Individual understanding, this can be more optimized for "fire lane and building should not be set up to hinder the operation of fire engines", and then in the corresponding provisions of the description of what the obstacles include. The standard design is bad and indirect, which brings difficulties to the architectural design work.
If in a regulation, because and the fruit have said all over, then still write the article explanation, no doubt equal to take off pants, fart. This article will undoubtedly continue to change in the next specification update, because the trees belonging to the plant, since it is so natural plant will grow, grow to a certain height also prevents fire operation, so from this article speaking should not set. But a house a week, not a few trees are not normal, so if you must set, will certainly be derived new regulations
Only ask the experts.In fact, this problem is very simple, the individual has been on the domestic norms of the experts are very disgusted, although the old and new norms change frequently, but these experts still can not change the simple problem of complex problems. Understand: this sentence can be simplified as "should not set obstacles such as trees, overhead pipeline between the fire lane and buildings, so simple, but not to be self defeating, want to step in with the cause and effect of one word of this provision all out, so there will be tens of thousands of like you this misunderstanding this architect. The reason I say this is self defeating is also a reason, each specification should be simple and clear exposition of the provisions, easy to remember, as for the interpretation of the provisions should go into provision to this
