caught me out there red-handed digging up roses - right across the st. from my church. I had permission from the last owner, but not this one - until today. Does this negate the long-standing rule that if a plant is stolen it will surely live?.Local Businesses gt; United States gt; Dallas?.
If the new owner doesn't give you permission, I say we bury him under his roses edit - Oh. Well, in that case, you're allowing the roses to live on. Good job. : )
if you want them, and no one is there, then i would say they are fair game. who cares if it is bein torn down anyway.
I like the joker's thinking. However, this is a case of procrastination gone bad. He who waits to do a good deed is often waiting to long to help anyone. It would have saved you grief dear to have removed those rose bushes earlier. However, since the good deed of saving something so precious as the roses. I am sure all will be forgiven. Besides what does the new owner care if they are going to bull doze the property anyway. He should be Thankful you care enough about something living anyways. Unless they had other intentions with the said bushes?? eh?
red-handed that's a good one ?:-))
