And have concluded, an Intelligent Being is responsible! How can creationists improve; the negative community perception that they are not very intelligent?Honestly, we want you as intelligent as the Lord has provided may this good news, relieve you, we prAy...
Pics or it didn't happen fancy way of saying I want a source. EDIT: YOU make a claim, YOU provide the source. Do you know how many stories about Nano science I will pull up from any number of news sources? HUNDREDS. Which means you need to post a source and I will read what it says and make a conclusion on whether you have a point or not... EDIT: So apparently you do NOT have a point. You went from Nano science to speaking in tongues... That's not very scientific, so you lose.
Thank you. Discoveries new and old are daily proving your point. And so is the laughter of the opposition. When people start sneering and name-calling, they are already announcing they know their argument lacks substance.
Cite your source. And that's quite a leap from point A to point B a) machinery inside DNA L E A P b) an intelligent being put it there. Sounds very suspicious and not like the scientific community at all.
And the bird is the word! And have concluded, an Intelligent Being is responsible! Citation? Link?
Even if they did conclude that an intelligent being is responsible (which I highly doubt they did) that would not mean that your particular god, or indeed any god at all did it. It would NOT conclude or even imply that your god responds to miracle or is divine, caring, interested in human affairs, omniscient, or omnipresent. At no point can you ever say '' Nano scientists discovered machinery inside DNA.... therefore my particular god (one among more than 25 000 gods) did it.'' This is bad logic. If you can't think objectively for yourself no wonder you believe in a god.
