what is the additive inverse of -a/3, and the answer is not 0.
It on no account equals zero on the grounds that 0 must be some of the causes and it doesn't have an additive inverse :-) 1. Four,sixteen, and sixty four are all best squares. I can't feel of any others that might be explanations of that number. 2. The method for the field of a circle in quantity 2 is pi * r^2. Take the radius and square it and multiply by pi. Three. 2.7 x 10^27 is the same as 27 x 10^26. 27 has a cubed root, but 10^26 would not. As a result this is not the answer. 2.7 x 10^28 is the same as 27 x 10^27. Each of those numbers have cubed roots. 2.7 x 10^29 and 2.7 x 10^30 are 27 x 10^28 and 27 x 10^29 respectively. Neither of these have the entire phrases which have cubed roots. 4. Number 4 you must be able to reduce some straws to a length of 5 cm or 5 inches or something. Then experiment with them and see if you could get all three of them to type a triangle (retaining 2 of them at right angles) or if you need one or two or all of them to be shorter or longer. 5. Sorry, cannot aid you with the last one.
In mathematics, the additive inverse, or opposite, of a number a is the number that, when added to a, yields zero. The additive inverse of a is denoted by unary minus: ?a. This can be seen as a shorthand for a common subtraction notation: ?a 0 ? a So the additive inverse of -a/3 is a/3! Good luck!
