The locker lock I want is circle shaped and has 4 arrows pointing to each part of the circle. In the middle of the lock is a circle and you push the circle left, right, up and down to put in your combination. This may sound confusing.. I'm sorry!
I think Pascal's wager has a false premise. It assumes that believing in a god is a choice, which it is not. You can't make yourself believe in something, You either do, or you don't.
1. You can't choose what you believe, you can't make yourself believe in god 2. Pascal's wager relies on a false dichotomy, there are infinite possible gods, and thousands of described gods 3. It presupposes Heaven, Hell, and punishment for people who don't have faith. It has been pointed out that a god might expect people to use their brains instead, and not believe things without evidence.
because of the fact Pascal is incorrect. Being an agnostic can in simple terms be the assertion of believing that the lifestyles of God can neither be proved nor disproved. Pascal believes that throughout basic terms the possibilities he provides are conceivable, and does not enable for the different solutions. His concept, to apply the occasion given, assumes you surely desire or desire a port. the seen being completely happy to be crusing indefinitely is skipped over for no different reason than he does not like it. A verbose opinionated fool continues to be an opinionated fool. EDIT: using the hyperlink to pedia above replaced into entirely valid and clever. the strategies there covers each argument we'd desire to declare, yet lack the flexibility to retype - it would be pearls previously swine if we did.
Go to the local Fire-house and ask them. They have up to date info. for your area and they know what you need to be safe. You can knock on their door just about anytime but make sure there are signs of movement before knocking they have to sleep some weird hours.
NO!!! Let me tell you what's wrong with Pascal's Wager it applies to EVERY GOD or GODDESS that has EVER been worshipped!! So if you want to be safe, you have to believe in ALL of them to cover ALL of your bases. Think of it this way. Imagine that we're all in a plane circling above some unknown terrain. At some point, each person has to jump out of the plane. Pretend that no one knows what awaits you after you jump. No one who has ever jumped is able to return to tell us what's down there. Since people in the plane don't like to be in the dark, they make up all kinds of stories about what could be down there. Some say it's spikes, some say it's water, some say it's nothing, some say it's fire, what have you. No one has any evidence or proof, but nonetheless, some people are absolutely convinced that their idea is 100% true. Everyone goes on and on about how you need to wear certain types of protection when you jump. The fire believers say you need to wear a certain type of fire suit. The spike people believe you need to wear a certain type of armor. The water people say you need to wear scuba diving apparatuses. The nothing people say you don't need to wear anything, you just jump. So the problem is, any smart person would realize that in order to be fully protected, you'd have to wear ALL of those forms of protection when you jump. If there's HUNDREDS of forms of protection, then you'd have to wear hundreds of suits. Not an easy feat, huh? THAT is why Pascal's Wager is a complete bunch of junk!! When a religious person actually tries to sound smart and pass it off on me as a reason to believe in their ridiculous tripe, I give them the airplane example and that shuts them up completely.
