Home > categories > Machinery & Equipment > Pile Driver > Which is better for the building foundation treated by a pile driver and a rammer?
Question:

Which is better for the building foundation treated by a pile driver and a rammer?

Which is better for the building foundation treated by a pile driver and a rammer?

Answer:

Generally speaking, the pile foundation is better. Of course, the dynamic compaction also has advantages, such as price and time. But when it comes to earthquake, certainly pile foundation compaction is not dominant, anti transverse shear and settlement, once the earthquake or what other effects caused by displacement and settlement, is very dangerous, as here in Hainan as an example, there are high-rise pile foundation, and the design of pile bottom are entered into force layer.
Compaction can not deal with: 1. around the fear of loess foundation soft soil /2. /3./ fall of vibration building. But the cost is cheap. The long-term effect is good.Piling can basically cope with any situation, but the cost will be high
Look at the geological structure. General multi-storey dynamic compaction machine, high-rise pile foundation, but also depends on the specific choice, depending on the soil, water content
Pile foundation for multilayer dynamic rammer (sometimes used in multilayer)Heavy tamping is mainly used for miscellaneous fill, loess and so onThere are many kinds of pile foundation, different application and natural soil bearing the same time, there is a composite foundation
The piling machine is only the two way to deal with the foundation. There is no good or bad building. The building will not fall off without an earthquake.

Share to: