Which performance is good, bulldozer or I5?!
Landlord, please explain exactly what kind of bulldozer, i5 is also divided into generations. Without words, I'm sorry, it's hard to evaluate.
I5, the bulldozer is a tragedy nowAMD behind in the framework and process, cause the single core performance behind, can not only make up for the reactor, and Intel dual core quad core to fight, eight core can spell and Intel quad. But the original process is backward, and the core, directly lead to power control, eight nuclear power has a radiator bulldozer to an alarming extent that the high-end version of the bulldozer are water standard. Increase the input of mainboard, power supply and heat dissipation in disguised form.More embarrassing is that, although theoretically enough to increase the core of single core performance problems, but now the software for the core support too much poor, resulting in eight nuclear what can not play its full performance, in order to compensate for the lack of single core than the Intel Core and idle. Or because the single nucleus is weak, the result tests many indicators or do not do I5. Plus the power to scare people...So I suggest you still I5.
E3 1230V2 doesn't explain..8M3 cache 3.3, clocked 4 core 8 threads, is not a wise choice for overclocking users.
1, as compared to FX4300 and i5 4430.2, FX4300 clocked at 3.8GHz, core frequency maximum 4GHz, i5 4430 3GHz, the highest core frequency is 3.2GHz, i5 can be seen at a slightly lower frequency, but this is not the performance, but the architecture of CPU, FX series of CPU using the module architecture, single thread performance is very weak, compared with i5 4430 Haswell architecture, single core is stronger than FX4300, as well as many nuclear FX4300.
