which one produces more light and uses less energy to work?
you're maximum surprising. existence is packed with tradeoffs. the super question right this is this: Are the potential fee discounts properly well worth the environmental pollution of the better mercury? Now some will say that the bulbs could be recyled and the mercury recovered. on the same time as real, it is going to take potential to do this. So, will the potential required to maintain the mercury out of the ambience be better than the potential fee discounts from utilising those bulbs? the respond is not any one yet knows. added: An letter from a reader to the Editor of The Wall highway magazine (4/25) noted an exciting element: on the same time as time-honored bulbs provide off greater warmth than gentle the warmth isn't wasted because of the fact the sunshine is frequently on in an indoor room interior the iciness and serves to characteristic warmth to the room to that end reducing the quantity of gas the furnace has to burn to warmth the room.
I assume your question refers to an LED light source, vs. an incandescent light bulb. The LED uses 1/6 the energy of an incandescent, for equal light output. The LED therefore produces 6x the light output FOR EQUAL POWER INPUT. Obviously, both kinds of light sources come in a wide range of sizes.
