Newer cars these days, like the 2010 Mazda3, can have both automatic and manual transmission mode. Does it cost the manufacturer substantially more to have both instead of just use one or the other? Or are they not mutually exclusive systems? Like the automatic is built on top of the manual.
That transmission is not ever really a manual, it's simply an automatic transmission that has a manual mode. There is no clutch, it has a torque converter just like any automatic, the difference is it has the mode to allow you to choose the gears yourself, so you decide rather than the computer. The real manual is still the best transmission for that car
c2953lm, you're gravely uninformed. The rebadged jap Nissan Skyline aka G35 interior the u . s . a . is a travesty to the Skyline call and historical past. Combining the G35 and 350z? How approximately all of them 3 have the same platform? The engine has no longer something in elementary. The Z and G have the VQ, the GT-R has a thoroughly redesigned VR engine. additionally, speedier lag is almost non-existent, because it peaks torque at little over 1000 rpms and maintains a mushy capability curve in the process the powerband. to place it in simple terms, it has greater torque in simple terms before a for sure aspired Corvette. i decide directly to advise which you examine up some technical tips, specs and particularly motive force comments in the previous you spew such uninformed opinion.
