i have a fourwheeler helmet, but its open in the front so if i ride in the evening bugs are insane. i need one with one of those face shield things, but idk how much they cost, or where to find them. (my dad probly knows where to find them) and dont suggest sunglasses, the only time i would need them would be after dark, and they wouldnt be helpful at all then.
The ABS module monitors the ABS system, the fault light is just an indication of a problem that the ABS Module detected. The module monitors the electrical part of the system (sensors, wiring, etc). The most common reasons for the ABS light to come on (when there is no problems) are: 1) Different tire sizes: if you put on a compact spare or a wheel with a different tire diameter it makes the computer think that the one wheel is always spinning at a different rate then the other three. That can cause the fault light to come on. 2) If you engaged the emergency brake / parking brake while driving: That can cause the module to see that the rear two wheels are turning slower then the fronts. That can cause the fault light to come on. 3) A bad sensor / or wiring: the sensors are often the most common part to fail on an ABS equipped car. -Ken
Your question assumes that the climate is supposed to be stable. The massive amounts of fossil fuels in the ground indicate that that organic material was once active in the biosphere. Which means it was either part of the biomass of living creatures and plants or in the atmosphere. Which would naturally mean and is born out by geological data, that the world was much warmer in the past. And also had a far greater volume of life. So, what is truly the consequence of unlocking all of this organic mass and energy of the past? Looking at it logically, the atmosphere would become warmer and rich in CO2. This would be a perfect environment for plants, leading to a worldwide vegetation bloom. As the plant mas increased CO2 levels would drop and O2 levels would rise. Temperatures would level off and animal life would thrive. It would basically be a return to Jurassic conditions. Would this be a change? yes. Would it completely disrupt modern life as we know it? yes. Is it wrong? Now that is a matter for philosophers. It is my opinion that the climate is more stable and more natural when this energy is released and in circulation in the life-cycle. It was the mass extinction events of the past that took large volumes of bio-mass out of circulation at once, that led to an unstable climate that we have been dealing with ever since. Now we have gotten accustomed to life as it is now, and most of us are averse to change. But we live on a changing planet. So we seek to stabilize an inherently unstable condition for our own comfort. Perhaps that is more wrong.
