ive noticed that not every country in the world have Nuke Silo's why how hard is it for a country to make one?
It's not difficult if you have the technology, but what is difficult, is to make a rocket that is big enough to launch it. Not only that, but you must test firing one with a similar load to a nuclear bomb. That could take you years to develop!
It's quite easy. All anyone needs are the proper materials and someone with the know how. The problem is those materials are expensive, and not every country can afford them.
In concept, that's relatively common. In practice, that's lots greater stable. the main subject is getting adequate fissile textile to construct the least perplexing nuclear weapon. you elect diverse Uranium spending diverse time in centrifuges to get adequate Uranium 235 or to generate adequate Plutonium, it extremely is likewise extremely perplexing. additionally, there is the Non-proliferation Treaty. this implies you ought to build each little thing from scratch your self, except you get help from the powers that did no longer sign in, like Pakistan or India. it is definitely extremely no longer common too - nuclear international locations savour the variety of protection tension disparity with non-nuclear ones that they do no longer provide it out certainly.
It is not hard to make one the problem is every other country must agree to your decision of yours because if a country not sufficient to keep it and protect is or is in urge to use it it may lead to global destruction and could be harmful for others.
Nuclear weapons are well understood, and a country with even a modest engineering industry would have no problem in making them. The real problems are threefold: The basic explosive material, uranium, is a relatively rare element and supplies might be hard to get hold of. There is also frequently an internal political problem - except in a dictatorship, the project can hardly be carried through without at least the passive connivance of the population. Funds need to be available, factories set up and so on. In Israel, for instance, even though the project was nominally secret it was widely known about (and approved of) long before Vanunu went public. Finally, there is an international and diplomatic difficulty. Many countries strongly disapprove of the spread of these powerful weapons. There is even a treaty which in principle limits proliferation. Trade, aid and military support - in fact the whole apparatus of international cooperation - might be endangered as a result of nuclear development. Again, this weighs less heavily on dictatorships and pariah states than on the civilised world. Hope this helps.
