Home > categories > Consumer Electronics > Power Banks > Obama issues gag order against Humana, Fed takes powers to issue wage limits to banks that NEVER accepted TARP?
Question:

Obama issues gag order against Humana, Fed takes powers to issue wage limits to banks that NEVER accepted TARP?

Are these usurptation's of power going to go unchallenged by anyone in court?The ACLU is right there for terrorists, where is the ACLU for Americans?Isn't there anyone or group with the cajones to stand up against this tyranny in court?

Answer:

Reading the articles, it looks as though Humana was NOT gagged; it was simply told to only present facts and let people decide (instead of taking a political position); I don't see anything wrong with that---provided it is applied uniformly. If it was a gag, why wasn't Humana in court claiming a free speech violation? Only reason why: It wasn't. As for issuing wage limits to banks that didn't accept or use TARP funds, I looked on Google and found nothing to support your claim; it is only on those that took their funds, and if THAT were done, it would be challenged as an ex post facto provision (a bank would not have taken the money if it knew of this).
0bama has under minded the foundation of liberty and violated the Constitution which he swore to uphold protect and defend! He needs removal by impeachment now!
The so-called gag order has already been lifted. The issue is moot and there is nothing for the ACLU or anyone else to challenge now. Every credible news source I've seen states that the pay limits apply only to banks that accepted bailout money. I came across a blog that stated exactly the same thing you are saying, but the link it provided did not support the assertion. If you have one, I'd love to see it.
i could say I trust numbers 4 and 5 one million) i individually do no longer understand sufficient approximately this subject count to agree or disagree. 2) If by the music marketplace, you recommend significant checklist labels, definite. The have the desire to make money, no longer sell artists. 3) merely because of the fact the corporation creates them does no longer recommend that folk could hear to them. 4 and 5 are surely appropriate. Even i'm in command of style 5. i think of that rap sucks, yet that is because of the fact what I hear is 50 Cent and Souljah Boy. If that is all that is available so a strategies as rap is going, then yeah, it sucks. i'm valuable there is extra advantageous stuff available, yet i'm merely no longer digging for it. quite, there's a great quantity of stuff available, yet you merely could understand the place to get it. the actual situation is human beings do no longer look previous the stable weight-help plan of crap that comes from the main labels and radio stations.
I think 0bama appointed ACORN to take care of that. Oh snap!

Share to: