taking receiver, trigger, barrel band and trigger group down to aluminumwas wondering a good way to protect them from corroding and what ever else could harm unfinished metalalso re-bluing barrel, and refinishing stockThanks any help is much greatly appreciated.
There's a basice trend to the Bohr modelThe first level has just two electronsThe second can have 8The third can also have 8The fourth can have up to 18Just look at your periodic tableIt's pretty much modeled after the way an atom has its electronsThe first level is the same as the first shellThere are two elements so there can be two electrons.
I have a couple of these rifle that have actually been frozen solid in water for weeks on end - and they still work greatMy ex-wife kept one by the driver door of her JeepWe live in Alaska - she had a nasty habbit of not kicking the snow off her shoesEventually the jeep heater melted the snow, it froze into a mini-lake, with the damn rifle frozen into it! The blue barrel was ugly, but, the aluminum parts all looked like a million bucksAfter 30+ years around salt water and boats - the only thing that kills aluminum is leaving salt water on it - and not washing itYou would have to forget the rifle in a fishing boat for a year to hurt it - but hey - it would make a wonderful excuse to buy a nice Valquartsen action.
First of all, an electron has a rest mass of 9.109 × 10^?31 kilogramsSecond, there do exist particles which have no mass but which still occupy spaceIn fact, there are entire stars that do this, called black holesThird, while the similarity of Bohr's model to the solar system is obvious to many people, few have seriously tried to draw any real connection; nor do I see how it has overtones or anything at all to do with the creation mythFinally, as creationists stubbornly refuse to understand, the difference between a theory and a myth is that a theory is a model of real phenomena, which is then vigorously tested against real-life observationsIf it doesn't stand up, then it is discardedBohr's model is a theory that didn't stand upThat is allNor is it obvious that since this model has proved inaccurate the apparent evidence was not so much evidence as speculationNobody speculated evidence (no scientists, I should say)The model was a speculation, if you will, that fit facts known at the timeAs more facts came to be known, the theory became invalidA myth is just a story, take it how you willIf someone sees enough money in it, they'll try to turn a myth into a religion by whatever dirty tricks they canTrying to portray science as a kind of religion is just as much a dirty trick as trying to palm off religion as a kind of science.
