The gap between China 's civil engineering building materials and abroad
If there is a gap, I think the most fundamental gap lies in its own positioning and positioning of their own direction of it. Affect the norm of the most fundamental or money, how much money to do many things, the standard to improve the money or do the same bad, regulate this thing itself is the result of multi-party game
Foreign understanding of Civil Engineering, so research and research materials, research and research computer, research and research methods and equipment, is not honest, and professional relationship can be big. By turning the Ministry of Education disciplines, you will find that in fact China's civil is also divided into structure, bridge and tunnel, geotechnical, municipal, disaster prevention and other directions, in fact, including a lot of things. As a very end application of the engineering disciplines, not self-limiting, and constantly try to cross the breakthrough should be righteous.
I think the attitude of the subject can explain the most fundamental gap - the positioning of their own position and their own development of the positioning of many high-rise building, the world's top 100 high-rise buildings in China nearly half, and many very high degree of public construction. Feel the 1950s norms copy the Soviet Union until now, the basic theoretical framework has not changed, the relative development of disciplines, the relative cutting-edge areas may be the direction of the material, have nothing to do with the professional relationship. Domestic understanding is often even narrow to the same as the building structure of the project, the subject is so understanding, this is not wrong, but our time on the demand for civil resources in this only, does not mean that civil engineering itself.
