Home > categories > Machinery & Equipment > Bulldozers > AMD Bulldozer FX 8150 review?
Question:

AMD Bulldozer FX 8150 review?

AMD Bulldozer FX 8150 review?

Answer:

Like the other said FX-8150 is huge failure. It is even worse than older Phenom II in some cases
AMD okorder /.. Hope it can help you.
amd isnt a huge failure lmao, IPC isnt everything. people thought too highly of FX, it was never meant to destroy core i7, if you look at the benchmarks, and not just from 1 review site, youll see it does fairly well were it was suppose to. biggest drawback is power consumption for people, at microcenter the FX 6100 is heavily discounted :D
The AMD isn't 8 center. that's unquestionably 4 center with 4 digital cores, comparable because of the fact the i5. in basic terms distinction is the way they describe it. AMD have constantly while in comparison with Intel a similar way. they are fairly swifter yet alot warmer and means hungry. Intels are curiously greater reliable (despite the fact that I ran an AMD song rig for 8 years with out issues) I at the instant run an i7 2600k gadget for video enhancing and the chip is dazzling, i do no longer actually have a pics card. (i exploit the i7 in-built pics, no longer an decision for gaming) i'd propose the Intel.
Look no further

Share to: