Last week my hazard warning lights stopped working, at the same time my windscreen washer stopped working. The indicators still work fine and the windscreen wipers still work fine. Any ideas? I couldnt find which fuse the washer system was on either (wasnt in the hand manual).The car is a 2003 Renualt Clio
check the warning light relay some autos use 2 different relays 1 for the turn signals and 1 for the 4 ways/As for as your washers either it is out of fluid or the Pump is bad
This Site Might Help You. RE: Question about earth science: limestone and shale? The Tully limestone stands out as a ridge of rock between valleys developed on the Moscow and Geneseo formations. What might account of this landscape pattern? That's the exact question. For those of you who aren't in 9th grade ES in NY, there's a thin layer of limestone.
i could lean in the direction of a relay on the probability lighting fixtures fixtures. no clue in the event that they tied in the washers besides, dont see why they could. verify underdash fuses and underhood fuses and replace the probability relay. needless to say its no longer the flasher relay with the aid of fact the flashers nevertheless paintings. look in the vendors instruction manual for fuse/relay places. in the adventure that your fuse puller is lacking, use small pliers to snatch onto the fuses. you need to have the skill to look down the factors to be certain if there's a destroy in the terminal.
I would lean towards a relay on the hazard lights. no clue if they tied in the washers as well, dont see why they would. check underdash fuses and underhood fuses and replace the hazard relay. obviously its not the flasher relay as the flashers still work. look in the owners manual for fuse/relay locations. if your fuse puller is missing, use small pliers to grab onto the fuses. you need to be able to look down the sides to see if there's a break in the terminal.
My initial thought was (2) (one is formed hot, the other not), but a lot of time the shale deposited on top of the basalt, so there would be no contact metamorphism expected (the basalt was already cool). So instead, I would say (3), because both basalt and granite form at high temperatures, and no matter which formed first, the other would be hot relative to the first one that was put into place, and thus would cause a zone of contact (thermal) metamorphism in the earlier rock. 1 and 4 are clearly not the answer.
