I was looking at open face helmets online and a question popped in my head.Which do you prefer or which is better(if there is a better) 1.Wearing no sun glasses and looking thru a shaded face shield?2.Wearing sun glasses and looking thru a clear face shield?Thanks!
Hip firing anything should cause extreme spread because you don't have the stock to your shoulder which means you are firing without using the sights, and that means unless the person is close enough to piss on, you aren't going to hit them. But let's say you had some sort of periscope made so you could hip-fire and use the sights, well you still have greatly increased uncontrollably because of the recoil. What video games don't seem to understand is that using a LMG for 'walking fire' (hold the gun at your hip firing at threats as you slowly walk forward) you can deliver accurate fire 25-50 meters away, but to fire a light machinegun PROPERLY you fold out the bipod and drop to your belly, at which time you are a threat out to 500 meters. Hell, you put it on a tripod and assuming it is a 'light' machinegun firing a full power cartridge, you can deliver accurate fire out to 2500 meters. Now, there have been times when waves of enemy troops are assaulting a position where grabbing a machinegun and hip-firing it CAN workbecause the ranges are very close and there are a lot of enemies and you don't really have any choice. But another factor that hip firing video games never take into account that as you fire the barrel heats up to scalding hot. The few cases where troops really grabbed machineguns and went off hip-firing to repulse a load of enemies, the gun barrels literally BURNED INTO the flesh on the guys arms. So before you think everyone can run around hip-firing a machinegun, try picking up a pan of boiling water, dump the water out and press it to your forearm. That's the kind of pain John Basilone faced when he did what I described abovein the face of overwhelming enemy forces, with no other real option, grabbed the machinegun off it's tripod and hip-fired to repulse a swarm of enemy troops, a move that unlike videogames is rare enough and heroic enough to earn him the Congressional Medal of Honor.
55 ford offered seat belts/cadillac had ac and auto dim lights/electric windows variable speed wipers were all available with auto trans/4speed hydromatic/fordamatic and powerglide/also you could go to pontiac and get convertible with tri power engine that would scream and storm/chevys with dual quads and or fuel injection/and the incomparible chrysler 300 c that was capable of 150 mph easy/those were the last of the cars years/way before the feds took over/bucket seats were available since the 30s/no airbags and abs/accident rates were lower because people actually had to pay attention/no cell phones and super ear buster radios and other toys
Ok Skippy I'm gonna give you a break on this one.Although the others are correct,during WWII there was a guy in the Pacific that picked up a BAR ( it could be a M1919 ) and fended off a bunch of Japs firing from the hip.It was literally like a scene from a movie.I can't remember his name but really did happen
No type of gun is suited for hip fire, as you can't aim that way. But when you learn more about guns you'll realize that very few video games are accurate with them. They only seem that way to people who don't know better. In a game make them do whatever you want.
No. No gun is accurate when hip-firing. The only thing that may help it hit anything is having a laser pointing sight on it. But it is nothing like really aiming a gun.
