I am planning to replace my old crt monitor with a new 19 one.But I can't choose the better one.Pls give me some comparison between them so that it makes my job a lot easier
If you plan to buy a 19 LCD then you need to check that your does your video card supports upto 1440X900 resolution otherwise you need a graphics card.
The technology behind LCD's means they do not flicker. Which means less strain on your eyes. You need to get one with a fast response time (2-5ms). Don't go to CRT's. The only reason anyone would buy a CRT now would be because it might have better colour representation (since its analogue) and may support higher resolutions on a smaller screen size. But really, CRT's are now expensive and hard to find new. Go LCD. Its the way of the future! All large companies and organistions such as universities will have phased out CRT's by now or within the next 1-2 years, so thats a good indicator of the best direction!)
Use an LCD monitor rather than a CRT. Most of us are probably using LCDs today anyway, but if you are using a CRT, consider switching. LCDs use less energy than CRTs. You can easily tell simply from the amount of heat a CRT produces. The standard refresh rate on VGA-capable monitors (which is all of them by today’s standards) is 60Hz whether you’re using CRT (tubed) or LCD (flat panel). With CRT, 60Hz is by far the worstrefresh rate to use because many suffer from what I call the “60Hz headache”. When you have a CRT set to this standard refresh rate there are many (myself included) that will develop a “dull” headache after about 30 to 45 minutes of use. In addition you may hear an almost inaudible high-pitched squealing noise. The cure to this ill is to change the rate to 70, 72 or 75Hz. The dull headache will go away and the noise will be gone. Those who have been using computers long enough (particularly at work) most likely have specially coated eyeglasses to combat against the ills of using a CRT at a 60Hz refresh. While this helps, changing the rate to a higher hertz is highly advised. With LCD, the best(usually) refresh rate to use is 60Hz. It’s the exact opposite of CRT. I only switched to 59 because it presented a better look to my eye. While it’s true CRT still has certain advantages (it’s still the best computer gaming monitor to date as there’s no such thing as “ghosting” on CRT), LCD is far better as far as your health is concerned. There’s no “crackle” of static discharge when the monitor is shut off, the power consumed is far less, and it’s far better for your eyes.
The selection is the main severe parameter here. liquid crystal reveal/LED video reveal gadgets furnish the utmost selection. finished HD (severe Definition) is one such selection - 1920 x 1080 P. 1920 pixels horizontally and 1080 pixels vertically and revolutionary test, all recommendations some physique is displayed at as quickly as. in comparison to in interleaved reveal the place in ordinary terms a million/2 the recommendations is displayed in a unmarried physique. decide for an LED reveal screen with finished HD reveal. LEDs devour much less potential, some 40% under liquid crystal reveal video reveal gadgets. i'm using an Acer H235H, finished HD, 23 inch liquid crystal reveal reveal screen which aspects recommendations-blowing reveal characteristics.
It depends on what better means. LCD's are the future, they generate less heat, cost less to operate, need less space and look cool. However, as far as picture quality and response time nothing can beat a good CRT, that is what most graphics professionals use. The one major problem with LCD's is that they work best using their native resolution. When you change the resolution on them outside that spec they distort the picture. In the end, it depends on what is important to you.
