In die mold, is it better to use UG or PROE? That's a quick one. Is it convenient?
From a beginner's perspective, my personal opinion is that UG entry and self-study can be done faster! 6. GUI interface, the function can remember the icon, at a glance, plus now UG has more information! If be offended, please give to teach! Comparison of the six: The mould design, UG is the first choice, the die standard parts have, a set of simple molds, 5 minutes mold, 5 minutes the mold embryo, again The top and other standard parts, water, 30 minutes, but you have to have a mold design experience. Seven of the comparison: Support for UG, because the PROE is really not as good as UG. I'm using PROE for two years, and UG for a year Give advice or comments.
UG is a hybrid model that can be partially parameterized (and, of course, fully parameterized), which is good for the model update. PTC is completely parameterized, edit update small design (home appliances), large (planes, cars), however, does not crash, the refresh time will affect the designer's idea. Comparison 9: talk about the conversion of format! UG core PARASOLID is generally supported by more than three dimensional software! Only the PROE insist The most simple! The most commonly used software is MASTERCAM, which can only be turned through raw IGES or STEP
If it's a product design it's better to use proe. If you're doing mold design or programming I think it's better to use ug. The ug submodule, which is fast enough to unplug the electrodes, and the ug external technology is very mature, and the unplugged electrode is automated in the way out of the material. Mold design main push UG. There is a high degree of UG promotion. Software updates are fast, and someone might say that software updates are too late. Update quickly indicates that software companies have the money to be able to do so. It's good to learn a version, like 4.0. Although there were 5.0, most of the factory software was not updated, and computer hardware couldn't keep up. The UG mould library is full of information and is commonly used in the dragon card mould library.
UG mainly suitable It is suitable for large automobile and aircraft factories to build complex digital models, and PRO/E is mainly suitable for small and medium-sized enterprises to establish relatively simple quickly Single d/a. When modeling is more complex, it is often no use for any parameter. I usually build PRO/E Start with a simple line frame, surface, and then move to the ug for the establishment and chamfer of advanced surfaces. Due to the product Repeated changes, most of which are deleted. Both software have advantages and should be combined to achieve the best results Fruit. When the parts are larger and more complex, the processing is usually done with ug, the cimatron is rough and the ug is processed
