Is the performance of the AMD bulldozer so bad?
Can't use "so bad" to describe the bulldozer, I'm here to take some time to talk about the current bulldozer, first of all say AMDIn the next generation of products, AMD is divided into two main blocks. One is APU, this series uses a new FM1 interface, itself CPU performance is not strong, mainly CPU and GPU integration technology. Among them, the core part of the performance is indeed better than the current SNB, can basically replace the entry-level level of independent standards. In the case of APU, it's more suitable for office and general entertainment users who do not have much demand for graphics cards. When they installed the basic does not need to buy alone, this is not the focus of this discussion is the beginning of another series of time and again out of the bulldozer. The main selling point of bulldozers is the promotion of CPU, using the AM3 interface. Unlike APU, it's the CPU integration GPU route, primarily to enhance CPU performance. The problem is, because of the development of the AMD suck, not only the product has not on the line, and from the leaked data, even the top FX8 series, its performance is only equivalent to the current SNB platform in I5, is that the A powder greatly disappointedThe working mode of bulldozer is different from that of all dragon series U now. Because the bottleneck in the field of technical strength, the single core ability of AMD can not do INTEL so powerful, so it has adopted the principle of 11 modules, namely two core modules to integrate into a single thread processing task. In other words, I can't compare you to a single core, so I'll use two cores to center you. Thus, the bulldozer series is called the "false multicore" series...
Well, when I hear the bulldozer, I can't lift it! Nuclear performance is not as good as its own fat dragon 6 nuclear, not to mention the victory, and I5 can tie a good, and there is a price, now Jingdong and Taobao have goods, but that price
