I think Bush is a great president. Why do people hate him so much?
Ignorance is bliss unfortunately, and many Americans would rather only listen to Rush Limbaugh, watch Fox News, and believe that every single thing their Evangalist says is true. I think that hits the final 30% of approving Americans.
Can you name any politician (except perhaps two or three) who do not change their story with the passing seasons. They are all the same so don't preach that Bush and Cheney are the only liars. If you want to impeach them then go after the entire Senate and House. They are all liars. It is politics!
People continue to support Bush and Cheney on the belief it will still somehow get better and it's getting worse. Granted we are fighting wars on two fronts using alot of tax payers dollars, but the main focus for Bush and Cheney should be what happening at home. And apparently they don't care. And when Bush leave office he will be far wealthier than when he entered the white-house. One one thing to add, why is the bible belt (the southern parts of the US) still voting for candidates who don't hold there best interest at heart. Only winning the presidency and redirecting there focus on other issues.
Every time? Why don't you go out in your back yard tonight and look up at the sky. Where's your moon now? __________________________ I'm not saying the moon is full all the time, but 95% of the time it's shining in the night. Uh, no, not even close. If we define nighttime hours as hours when the sun is below the horizon, and moonlit hours as hours when the moon is above the horizon, then only 50% of nighttime hours are moonlit. If we define nighttime hours as hours when there is not enough sunlight or twilight in the sky to find your way home, and moonlight hours as hours when there _is_ enough moon light to find your way home, then it would be even less than 50%. And that's not taking clouds into consideration. moons that aren't full are a work of art in my opinion. What th'.? Is this a conversation about your opinion? My mistake! I thought you were interested in facts.
Do you remember seeing pictures of Osama Bin Laden talking on a cell phone? Because of idiots like the editors at the New York times releasing stories telling of how the U.S. almost had him by locating the cel and calling a strike on the location he no longer uses them. He no longer takes videos out doors, for fear of showing his location. It may seem obvious, but they didn't think of it. And if it is so obvious why does the Times have to report it? Why HELP THE ENEMY in ANY way? I can not understand why the U.S. press can not report any of the good being done over there but insist on reporting anything declared top-secret? Who's side are they on? Who are they to decide if this information should not be top-secret? They are setting a very dangerous precedent.
