I am looking at two 65-in screens: either a large (commercial-grade) LCD monitor, or a regular LCD HDTV. If I get the LCD monitor, I would buy the optional TV tuner box for $90 extra. Each of my 2 options is approximately the same price, has the same resolution (1920x1080), and is 65-inches.My question is: would the monitor offer a better picture than the TV? Or vice versa? I am using it for 50% monitor use (hooked up to my macbook pro) doing regular computer work, and 50% watching TV and DVDs. In both use cases, I am sitting near the minimum (monitor use) and maximum (TV use) viewing distances (8.13 - 13.5 feet). Thanks!
The commercial grade is always better than the consumer grade product no matter what it is. Commercial grade has certain specs that requires more robust parts due to heavier use. Hands down the better product in the long run is commercial. Performance will be better, but only a trained eye or in the case of speaker ear can appreciate the nuanced differences. Someone who does something all day will find it hard to live with consumer electronics, it is simply not good enough to the craft. Given all else is even the LCD monitor with the tuner box is the way to go. Last thought, I know you can have a split screen with the monitor, which can be an added reason to purchase the monitor over the tv, but I don't know if the tv has the same type of flexibility if you intend to link a desk or laptop in the mix. Best.
HDTV wont display the brightest color as LCD do. however. LCD has running hours and wont last a lifetime
