So for desktops and all computers is the i5 still the best or are the new bulldozers better? I want the beat processor cuz I play demanding games so I need a good processor please tell if it's close a d If I should upgrade please !!!!
By benchmark and no overclocking the amd - fx 8150 is better than the i5-2500k , while still a good processsor also for gaming is a i7-2600k in which fall short of the best processor for gaming i7-990x extreme out performs all three ,the price is about 1000 dollars but really worth it .
People claiming the Bulldozer or even the 990X are better than the i5 2500k for gaming need to shut up and leave. They are utterly clueless. Bulldozer gets slapped silly by the i5 2500k in gaming benchmarks and the 990X is pointless overkill as a bunch of cores go unused, making it slower than an i5 2500k in gaming. Do you boobs even know what a benchmark is?
AMD's Bulldozer seems to have not impressed anyone. Intel is still the king of the hill, after all. Darnit...was hoping to see competition drive prices down. In fact, in most tests, the Phenom II x6 beat the new chip (which has 8 cores!). The &best& processor would probably be the Core i7 990X Extreme Edition...just based on performance. However, an i5 is better suited because it won't cost a grand.
the best gaming processor is still the Intel Core i5-2500K (best performance/price ratio), why? let's do a simple math the passmark score of the i5-2500K (quad core) vs the brand new Zambezi FX-8150 (eight core) is as follows (these values are achieved only if all cores are running simultaneously) i5-2500K: 7386 FX-8150: 8681 hooray, the Bulldozer is faster! -------- wrong, totally wrong! we have to keep in mind how gaming programs are written. games can hardly or not use more than 4 cores (4 threads) simultaneously. hence we have to break it down on a performance per core. now the picture looks quite different. the per core score is: i5-2500K: 1846 FX-8150: 1085 assuming a game can use 4 cores simultaneously then the score looks as follows i5-2500K: 7386 FX-8150: 4340 huh, good bye Zambezi! the i5 is faster even if it run only on 3 cores (5538)
the respond is stable there $2 hundred greater for a .a million of a difference no longer likely properly worth it. they're the two virtually same spec smart The 4820 has 10MB of smart cache while in comparison with the 4700 in basic terms having 8MB. i could decide for the $3 hundred one and purchase a competent pictures card and memory and your set. In my rig I surely have i7 3820 with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 2GB GDDR5 and 24GB of memory and a couple of 2TB annoying drives one for the OS one and the different to run the video games, works wonderful for me.
