Today I just bought these two budgies for my best friend for Christmas. She knows I'm getting her budgies. I was just thinking she usually asks me for name ideas and stuff so I was thinking do any of you guys have any ideas?This one:
My experience both as employer and employee is that employers have a great incentive to keep people. Even in what are considered unskilled jobs having somebody who knows the requirements of the job is a valuable asset. I owned a janitorial service for many years. There were broom pushers and there were professional janitors. Broom pushers had a higher turn over rate. Many were just getting into the job market. Some I had to let go because they were not conscientious. If someone is willing to pay for a job, it is a valuable job. I never had incentive to fire a professional janitor. Just the opposite. I invested time and money teaching them various health codes, sanitation requirements of our customers. You might not think about it the floor wax used in a medical office is different than what is used for a clothing store. So I disagree with your premise. Employers want to keep employees. If somebody gets fired there is a reason. Might not be the employees fault but no employer wants to lose employees. If nothing else more workers means that you have the business to require more workers. That usually means more profit. So basic greed motivates employers to keep people. Edit: How did I de-humanize anybody. They were hired as broom pushers. They generally thought that being a janitor was not good enough for them They were hired for a job, did not want to be trained as professionals and expected to lose their job when the employer did not have enough work for them. The employer (me) was going to try to keep the people who did learn the trade. Therefore becoming more valuable both to the employer who had invested in them and themselves.
Here is the Department of labors web site: anized lesson plan, does not interact with the children, i want them to be fired wouldn't you.
people don't get fired for 'no reason'..the employee may not want to admit to being fired by stating 'no reason', but there is ALWAYS a reason..the level of economy reaches far beyond an employee.. businesses also spend a LOT of money on ea prospective employee, so they truly don't like playing revolving door with themyou are very limited in your knowledge of the economy.. we all know that it's productivity that gets results, not smiling facesemployers here are not all deadbeatswe all know that there are a lot of employee deadebeats that feel entitlted
I agree. I've made similar arguments before. A sample: I do believe that more people today than in my grandparents generation tend spread what ever rumours they hear, without actually stopping to consider the accuracy of the statements first. I think it's because some modern societies have taught people that getting online and reading a page is plenty of effort, and that doing real hands on research is overkill. I mean, you don't even walk into a place to make order dinner anymore. It's too much work. Now you go online, pay with a credit card, and complain if the food isn't here in less than half an hour because any longer than that is a ridiculous amount of time to have to wait for anything.Actually, you don't even have to pay with a credit card any more. Because having to get up, walk to your wallet, open it, and type your number into it, is way too much work for paying for dinner! Now you just log on to your online account, and PRESTO! Dinner is on it's way!!! It seems information is only learned if someone hands it to you; and then it's infallible, because to contradict the information, would mean more work. Thinking, and researching. Ouch! Brain hurts Granted, this was not about job security, but the idea that people just repeat information, and stick to it, with no apparent concerns for accuracy, is exactly what I tried to explain! Also, In my country, you really have to screw up to get fired, and you are right, our economy is hardly touched compared to the economies in the countries around mine. The system works!
I work with people who have been abused as children, and it seems that the thing they most need is someone to be there and listen, and provide safety and reassurance should they need it. However, you don't say how old this child is, or what your relationship is with them? I'd also suggest that if you aren't involved in this aspect of their care or life, then treating them normally and like any other child (and that means proper boundary-setting and no special treatment) would be the best way to go. Some people recover well from child abuse - others less so, but having it colour every aspect of their lives isn't a good thing. It would also be good to be aware of your own reactions and feelings about child-abuse - how realistic or appropriate is it for you to save or rescue this child - and is it in their own best or long-term interests. I understand your dilemma though - if this child talks to you about their feelings of not being normal, for instance, make sure you talk to their primary carer and get their advice on how to take this up with the child - abused children need adults to be reading from the same page as much as possible, as they often have had secrets or very different stories from adults which can confuse or worse. Good luck.
