my professor asked us to write a paper about a newly passed bill (law) and told us to focus on plight of access. what the hell does that mean?
So you are OK with Sharpton's army being bussed into town in order to start a violent protest? Becouse that is what happened in Chicago, it wasn't random, it was organized, by the same outsides that feed the riots a couple of years back. Peaceful protestors don't come armed with rotten vegetable, baseball bats hidden as protest sign post, they don't push women and children to the ground as they make their way through the crowd. All on video, all from the peaceful protestors.
If the average yield of a nuclear weapon is 50 kilotons and there are 30,000 nuclear weapons on earth, this gives us a total yield of 1.5 gigatons, which is 6.276 x 10^18 joules. The crater would be tens of kilometres across and perhaps over several kilometres deep. As for punching through the crust, let's look at a few values. Silica, one of the main components of the earth's crust, has a SHC of 800 joules per Kg per kelvin, a boiling point of 2,550 K and a density of 3000 kg/m^3. The continental crust is on average 40 km thick. To melt and vaporize a 40 x 40 x 40 km (64,000 km^3) part of the crust down to the mantle would require at the very least 3.8784 X 10^23 J., but craters are much wider than they are deep, so you'd be looking at a crater some 400 km across to punch through the crust, which would require a much greater amount of energy still. All of the earth's nuclear weapons combined would fall some five orders of magnitude short of generating enough energy to create a crater big enough to reach the mantle, although it would create a dust cloud large enough to blanket the sun for a year or more. it is likely that, if the Apophis asteroid were to collide with earth in 2036, it's impact energy would exceed the sum of all nuclear weaponary in current arsenals, although not anywhere near the Chicxulub impact 65 million years ago.
if they dug all nukes underground and set them off then maybe
