Neither criminal used a bulldozer. Why not use facts? Why should a criminal's family be punished for a criminal act the family was not involved in?
They also called it a terrorist attack. It is part of the propaganda to call everything you can in the most shocking and horrifying terms and label it as terrorist right now. It is much more dramatic than saying it was a depressed and troubled teenager running a tractor type loader.
Does it really matter whether it was a bulldozer or a front-end loader or whatever? The point is, both times Arabs on heavy-duty construction vehicles went on rampage and killed and wounded innocent Israelis, including infants and children.
Because to some a plane is a plane 777 or a Constellation and every ground mover is a bulldozer. For the same reason a family is held responsible when their dog bites. When a parent knows and does nothing he is legally responsible, so is anyone that knows a crime is going to be committed and does nothing. And don't tell me they don't know, the family ties are such that all know all. An accessory must generally have knowledge that a crime is being, or will be committed. A person with such knowledge may become an accessory by helping or encouraging the criminal in some way, or simply by failing to report the crime to proper authority. The assistance to the criminal may be of any type, including emotional or financial assistance as well as physical assistance or concealment. We are talking mad dogs ain't we ?
Because most people who are unfamiliar with heavy equipment dont know what a front end loader is so bulldozer is a generic term, kinda like kleenex.
