is the general lack of fire trucks, cement trucks, boats and staff an indication that the meltdown has already happened at Fukushima?if there were not serious levels of radiation then the Japanese would be swarming over that place like antsthere would be fire trucks, ambulances, cranes, cement trucks, etc, etcthe meltdown has ALREADY HAPPENEDWHERE are the vehicles??WHERE are the staff??it's TOO DANGEROUS for them!
Oh my God! Woe is me!! For over 40 years after WW2 we tested nuclear weapons - in Nevada! Atom bombs, hydrogen bombs, ground level explosions, under and over ground explosions, high altitude explosionsOther than a few health anomalies for those who lived near the test sites THERE WERE NO CALAMITIES IN THE SURROUNDING STATESNo mass radiation poisoning, no fingers falling off - nothing! No harmful fall out in the surrounding states or anywhere elseThe harm resulting from Chernobyl, it turns out, was in the immediate area, even though the fallout reached hundreds of miles beyondThe safe zone there is 19 miles from the plant – totally insignificantSeen pictures of Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Both are thriving cities todayCasualties resulting from the Three Mile Island leak? Zero (more people died in Ted Kennedy’s car than all US nuclear power plant mishaps in history)The socialists are attempting to create yet another panic (like manmade global warming, second hand smoke, overpopulation) to justify ever more power for themselvesNow listen to me: One, two, three….PANIC! That’s it, nice little laboratory animal.
Gloss black mirrors?.i guess you already ugraded your exhaust.
Why on earth are you looking at a V6 Mustang? V8 or go home.
I've received a 2011 V6 Mustang and that i like itHowever, i'm slightly surprised at how accepting all people is of this 30+ mpg that Ford says the stang will getLet me be clear about one factor- the stock V6 does not get 5.1 zero-60 even as it will get 30+ mpgThe stock V6 has a 2.Seventy three rear end ratio versus the monitor % [or optional standalone stronger rear end ratio] of three.31The monitor p.CEssentially mimics the GT suspension and so has rather higher dealing with traits than the V6, but most effective any one who is rather in tune with a rear wheel force car will ever be ready to tell the changeAnd again, on the street, if you force sanely you're going to never test the limits except you're taking an on or off ramp at paceThe V6 suspension is that excellent [drove it on a racetrack up north here in Ontario]I suppose if extra persons have been to power the V6, they might be greater than pleasantly amazed with how some distance Ford has progressed with the engineI rented a Mazda three out west, [non turbo, lot less powerful], and with the entrance finish tug on heavy acceleration with front wheel force, the believe of the car is wholly distinct to the V6The Acura CL V6 I traded in on the stang was the 260 hp mannequin with about 240 lbft of torque and it had torque steer, even with traction manipulate, so I assume the Mazdaspeed will as goodOh and incidentally, I just lately rented a Mustang GT with the ~ four hundred hp engine, for just a few days in Nova Scotia and brother, is that a strong tripIn case you quite are eager about either vehicle, then for certain take a scan pressure and like mentioned in different places, do not forget about the WRX for evaluation drivingExcellent good fortuneEach automobiles are best in their own approach.
